4.2 Article

Stringent constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section from the region of the Galactic Center

Journal

ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 55-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.04.007

Keywords

Gamma-rays

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. Fermilab Fellowship in Theoretical Physics
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeisoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. National Science Foundation [PHY-1066293]
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. Fermilab Fellowship in Theoretical Physics
  7. Coordenacao de Aperfeisoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  8. National Science Foundation [PHY-1066293]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For any realistic halo profile, the Galactic Center is predicted to be the brightest source of gamma-rays from dark matter annihilations. Due in large part to uncertainties associated with the dark matter distribution and astrophysical backgrounds, however, the most commonly applied constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section have been derived from other regions, such as dwarf spheroidal galaxies. In this article, we study Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope data from the direction of the inner Galaxy and derive stringent upper limits on the dark matter's annihilation cross section. Even for the very conservative case of a dark matter distribution with a significant (similar to kpc) constant-density core, normalized to the minimum density needed to accommodate rotation curve and microlensing measurements, we find that the Galactic Center constraint is approximately as stringent as those derived from dwarf galaxies (which were derived under the assumption of an NFW distribution). For NFW or Einasto profiles (again, normalized to the minimum allowed density), the Galactic Center constraints are typically stronger than those from dwarfs. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available