4.2 Article

Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with the ANTARES neutrino telescope

Journal

ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 634-640

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.02.007

Keywords

Magnetic monopole; Neutrino telescopes; ANTARES

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. Commissariat a l' energie atomique et aux energies alternatives (CEA)
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  4. Commission Europeenne
  5. Region Alsace (contrat CPER)
  6. Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur
  7. Departement du Var and Ville de La Seyne-sur-Mer, France
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany
  9. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  10. Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)
  11. Nederlandse organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), The Netherlands
  12. Council of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists and leading scientific schools, Russia
  13. National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS), Romania
  14. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN)
  15. Prometeo of Generalitat Valenciana (GVA)
  16. MultiDark, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic monopoles are predicted in various unified gauge models and could be produced at intermediate mass scales. Their detection in a neutrino telescope is facilitated by the large amount of light emitted compared to that from muons. This paper reports on a search for upgoing relativistic magnetic monopoles with the ANTARES neutrino telescope using a data set of 116 days of live time taken from December 2007 to December 2008. The one observed event is consistent with the expected atmospheric neutrino and muon background, leading to a 90% C.L. upper limit on the monopole flux between 1.3 x 10-(17) and 8.9 x 10(-17) CM-2 s(-1) sr(-1) for monopoles with velocity beta >= 0.625. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available