4.2 Article

An examination of utilizing external measures to identify sexually maturing female American eels, Anguilla rostrata, in the St. Lawrence River

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 271-287

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020502119936

Keywords

discriminant analysis; migration; morphometrics; ovarian development; sexual maturation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well established that Anguillid eels undergo complex suite of morphological and physiological changes during their transformation from resident, yellow-phase juveniles to actively migrating silver-phase eels. While it has been shown that some morphological measures can be used successfully to identify sexually maturing European eels, Anguilla anguilla, as well as Australian short fin, Anguilla australis, and long fin, Anguilla dieffenbachii eels, this relationship has never been quantitatively assessed for American eels, Anguilla rostrata. American eels of varying sexual development were collected from three locations on the St. Lawrence River: Lake St. Lawrence, Quebec City and Kamouraska. Sexual development of each eel was assessed with gonadosomatic index (GSI), oocyte diameter and degree of oocyte development. Morphological measures of total length, weight, head width, pectoral fin length and vertical and horizontal eye diameters were obtained from each fish. We used this data to test two hypotheses: (i) resident yellow phase eels, suspected migrants and known migrants are morphologically indistinguishable; and (ii) if differences exist, they cannot be used to reliably predict gonadal development or migratory status. Univariate analysis ( ANOVA and ANCOVA) indicated that there were highly significant differences in all of the measured parameters and thus we were able to reject the first hypothesis. However, we failed to reject the second hypothesis as the high degree of overlap between groups eliminated the ability of any single measure to differentiate between resident and migratory eels. A multivariate discriminant model was developed that could classify only 72-80% of the eels correctly based on their morphological characters. While morphological measures may have some potential as rapid, cost-effective method of pre-screening individual eels, morphological measures should not be considered definitive indicator of sexual maturity or migratory status for female American eels in the Upper St. Lawrence River.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available