3.8 Article

Impact of exposure to a simulated predator (Mergus merganser) on the activity of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in a natural environment

Journal

Publisher

NATL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA
DOI: 10.1139/Z02-176

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some laboratory studies suggest that the presence of predators influences the short-term behaviour of juvenile Atlantic salmon. However, few studies have been conducted in the natural environment to confirm these observations and to document how biological and environmental factors influence the behaviour of fish faced with a predator. Of the many potential predators of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, the common merganser, Mergus merganser, is a major one. This study was designed to investigate the immediate and short-term impact of exposure to a simulated avian predator on the activity of juvenile Atlantic salmon in their natural habitat. The influence of riverbed sediment grain size, a major determinant of habitat choice in salmon, and body size of juvenile salmon on the nature and intensity of their response to the predator was also investigated. Observations were made before and after exposure to a model of M. merganser in three situations: (1) fry (young salmon during their first summer of life) on fine sediment, (2) fry on coarse sediment, and (3) parr (young salmon during their second or third summer of life) on coarse sediment. Observations were also made on fry exposed to a harmless floating stimulus to evaluate if the decoys were perceived as threat. Following exposure, the feeding rate of juvenile salmon decreased by 25-39% and the moving rate increased by 123-386%. Sediment grain size influenced the nature of the immediate response of juvenile salmon, while body size influenced the intensity of the moving response. Parr moved significantly more than fry after exposure to the simulated predator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available