4.6 Article

Hot dust in normal star-forming galaxies:: JHKL′ photometry of the ISO Key Project sample

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 394, Issue 3, Pages 873-882

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021335

Keywords

galaxies : spiral; galaxies : starbursts; galaxies : ISM; ISM : dust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present JHK and 3.8 mum (L') photometry of 26 galaxies in the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) Normal Galaxy Key Project (KP) sample and of seven normal ellipticals with the aim of investigating the origin of the 4 mum emission. The majority of the KP galaxies, and all the ellipticals, have K - L less than or similar to 1.0, consistent with stellar photospheres plus moderate dust extinction. Ten of the 26 KP galaxies have K - L greater than or similar to 1.0, corresponding to a flat or rising 4 mum continuum, consistent with significant emission from hot dust at 600-1000 K. K-L is anticorrelated with ISO flux ratio F-6.75/F-15, weakly correlated with line ratio [O I]/[C II], but not with [C II]/FIR or IRAS ratio F-60/F-100. Photodissociation-region models for these galaxies show that the hot dust responsible for red K-L resides in regions of high pressure and intense far-ultraviolet radiation field. Taken together, these results suggest that star formation in normal star-forming galaxies can assume two basic forms: an active, relatively rare, mode characterized by hot dust, suppressed Aromatic Features in Emission (AFEs), high pressure, and intense radiation field; and the more common passive mode that occurs under more quiescent physical conditions, with AFEs, and without hot dust. The occurrence of these modes appears to only weakly depend on the star-formation rate per unit area. Passive star formation over large scales makes up the bulk of star-forming activity locally, while the active regime may dominate at high redshifts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available