4.6 Article

Abnormal echogenic findings detected by transesophageal echocardiography and cardiorespiratory impairment during total knee arthroplasty with tourniquet

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 1123-1128

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00014

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, intraoperative pulmonary embolic events are rare, and most occur following tourniquet deflation. This embolization can be observed using transesophageal echocardiography. However, the authors have encountered sudden decreases in arterial oxygen partial pressure while a tourniquet is still inflated. Therefore, the current investigation was designed to detect emboli during the tourniquet inflation phase and to identify the composition of the echogenic material. Methods: Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to undergo total knee arthroplasty without (control, n = 24) or with a tourniquet (n = 22). Hemodynamic monitoring, blood gas analysis, and continuous transesophageal echocardiography were performed during the total knee arthroplasty procedure. Right jugular blood specimens were collected whenever echogenic material was seen in the atrium. Results. In the tourniquet group, embolic events occurred in 27% of patients during femoral reaming and in 100% after tourniquet deflation. in the control group, emboli were detected in 54% of patients during femoral reaming. Most of the patients exhibited cardiopulmonary impairment after severe echogenic embolism, even while the tourniquet was inflated (two patients). None of the blood samples aspirated from the central catheters contained detectable material. Conclusions. This prospective study showed that embolic events occurred during total knee arthroplasty, even while a tourniquet was inflated. An inflated tourniquet does not completely prevent pulmonary emboli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available