4.6 Article

Elicitation of simian immunodeficiency virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in mucosal compartments of rhesus monkeys by systemic vaccination

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 22, Pages 11484-11490

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11484-11490.2002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA050139, CA50139] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00168, K26 RR000168, P51 RR000168] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI020729, AI48394, R37 AI020729, AI28691, P30 AI028691, U19 AI028147, U01 AI028147, AI28147, AI20729, R01 AI048394, AI85343, P01 AI028147] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since most human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are initiated following mucosal exposure to the virus, the anatomic containment or abortion of an HIV infection is likely to require vaccine-elicited cellular immune responses in those mucosal sites. Studying vaccine-elicited mucosal immune responses has been problematic because of the difficulties associated with sampling T lymphocytes from those anatomic compartments. In the present study, we demonstrate that mucosal cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) specific for simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and simian HIV can be reproducibly sampled from intestinal mucosal tissue of rhesus monkeys obtained under endoscopic guidance. These lymphocytes recognize peptide-major histocompatibility complex class I complexes and express gamma interferon on exposure to peptide antigen. Interestingly, systemic immunization of monkeys with plasmid DNA immunogens followed by live recombinant attenuated poxviruses or adenoviruses with genes deleted elicits high-frequency SIV-specific CTL responses in these mucosal tissues. These studies therefore suggest that systemic delivery of potent HIV immunogens may suffice to elicit substantial mucosal CTL responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available