4.2 Article

Mitochondrial DNA variation and the phylogeography of the grey partridge (Perdix perdix) in Europe:: from Pleistocene history to present day populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 971-982

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00460.x

Keywords

control region; grey partridge; introductions; mitochondrial DNA; Perdix perdix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For a phylogeographical analysis of European grey partridge (Perdix perdix) we sequenced 390 nucleotides of the 5 end of the mitochondrial control region (CR) of 227 birds from several localities. The birds were divided into two major clades (western and eastern) which differed in control region 1 (CR1) by 14 nucleotide substitutions (3.6%). For estimation of the time of divergence, the whole CR of 14 specimens was sequenced. The major clades differed by 2.2%, corresponding to an estimated coalescence time of c. 1.1 million years. On CR1, 45 haplotypes were found. Western clade haplotypes were found in France, England, Germany, Poland, Italy and Austria. Eastern clade haplotypes were found in Finland, Bulgaria, Greece, and Ireland. One Finnish population and all Bulgarian and Irish populations were mixed, but only in Bulgaria was the mixing assumed to be natural. Nucleotide and haplotype diversities varied between populations, and both clades showed geographical structuring. The distribution of pairwise nucleotide differences in the eastern clade fitted the expectations of an expanding population. About 80% of the genetic structure in the grey partridge could be explained by the clades. The western clade presumably originates on the Iberian Peninsula (with related subtypes in Italy), and the eastern clade either on the Balkan or Caucasian refugia. Largescale hand-rearing and releasing of western partridges have introduced very few mtDNA marks into the native eastern populations in Finland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available