4.4 Article

Effect of boundary layer reactions on the conversion of char-N to NO, N2O, and HCN at fluidized-bed combustion conditions

Journal

COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 11-2, Pages 43-71

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/713712945

Keywords

pollutants; char combustion; fluidized beds; NO; N2O

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of boundary layer reactions on the conversion of char-N to NO, N2O, and HCN was studied by a coupled experimental/theoretical approach. In the experimental part, the evolution of HCN at conditions of a batch fluidized-bed reactor was studied. The results show that the char-N conversion to HCN is very low under normal oxidizing conditions. This explains why it was not detected by early studies of this system. The results also suggest that the release of HCN is related to gases released when the char is oxidized rather than to late devolatilization reactions. The product distribution is modeled using heterogeneous reactions on the char surface coupled with homogeneous reactions in the gas phase. Three cases were analyzed. In Case A, only the heterogeneous production of N2O and NO was considered. In Case B, HCN and NO heterogeneous production was considered. Finally, Case C combined cases A and B by allowing the heterogeneous production of NO, N2O, and HCN. Cases A and B predict most of the qualitative trends for the char-N conversion to N2O reported in the literature. However, Case A fails to predict the experimentally observed release of HCN when oxidation around the particle is suppressed. Among the three cases, Case C is the one that closely predicts experimental observations. Finally, the predictions obtained by the model are used to define further experiments, particularly on the evolution of gas concentration in the boundary layer with char burnout, which can be useful to obtain more insight into the mechanism of nitrogen oxide formation during char oxidation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available