4.3 Article

Structure and superconductivity in Zr-stabilized, nonstoichiometric molybdenum diboride

Journal

PHYSICA C-SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS
Volume 382, Issue 2-3, Pages 153-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4534(02)01861-0

Keywords

intermetallic superconductor; isotope effect; crystal structure; specific heat; electronic structure; neutron diffraction; electron microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure and physical properties of the Zr-stabilized, nonstoichiometric molybdenum diboride superconductor are reported. Good quality material of the diboride structure type can only be obtained by partial substitution of Zr for Mo, and quenching of melts. The diboride phase is best made with boron in excess of the ideal 2:1 boron to metal ratio. Powder neutron diffraction measurements show that the nonstoichiometry is accommodated by atom deficiency in the metal layers. The diboride structure type exists for (Mo0.96Zr0.04)(x)B-2 for 1.0 greater than or equal to x greater than or equal to 0.85. Electron diffraction shows that the stoichiometric material, x = 1, has a significant number of stacking faults. T-c increases from 5.9 to 8.2 K with the introduction of metal vacancies. Resistivity measurements indicate that (Mo0.96Zr0.04)(0.88)B-2 is a bad metal, and specific heat measurements show its electronic density of states (DOS) is gamma = 4.4 mJ/mol K-2, and that DeltaC/gammaT(c) = 1.19. Preliminary boron isotope effect measurements indicate an exponent alpha = 0.11 +/- 0.05. Analysis of the data in terms of the electronic structure is reported, allowing an estimate of the electron-phonon coupling constant, lambda approximate to 0.1-0.3, making these weak-coupling superconductors. Preliminary characterizations of the superconductivity in the related phases NbxB2 and (Mo0.96X0.04)(0.85)B-2 for X = Ti and Hf are reported. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available