4.7 Article

Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging and function in patients with growth hormone deficiency with and without mutations in GHRH-R, GH-1, or PROP-1 genes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 87, Issue 11, Pages 5076-5084

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2001-011936

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pituitary stalk interruption and ectopic posterior lobe on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequently observed in patients with GH deficiency (GHD), but their pathogenesis remains controversial. We performed pituitary stimulation tests, MRI, and studied GH-1, GHRH receptor (GHRH-R), and Prophet of Pit-1 (PROP-1) genes in 76 patients with GHD. Of 33 patients with isolated GHD, 4 had GH-1 deletions and 4 had GHRH-R mutations; of 43 patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiency, 1 had PIT-1 and 5 had PROP-1 mutations. Compared with the 62 patients without mutations, 14 patients with mutations had higher frequency of consanguinity (57 vs. 2%, P < 0.001), familial cases (21 vs. 3%, P < 0.05), and lower frequency of breech delivery or hypoxemia at birth (0 vs. 39%, P < 0.005). On MRI, all patients with mutations had an intact stalk, whereas it was interrupted or thin in 74% without mutations (P < 0.001). The posterior pituitary lobe was in normal position in 92% of patients with mutations against 1317c without mutations (P < 0.001). Among patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiency, hormonal deficiencies were of pituitary origin in all with PROP-1 and PIT-1 mutations and suggestive of hypothalamic origin in 81% without mutations. Perinatal insults were associated with thin/interrupted pituitary stalk, ectopic posterior lobe, and hypothalamic origin of hormonal deficiencies. In contrast, GH-1, GHRH-P., and PROP-1 mutations were associated with consanguineous parents, intact pituitary stalk, normal posterior lobe, and pituitary origin of hormonal deficiencies. We conclude that pituitary MRI and hormonal response to stimulation tests are useful in selection of patients and candidate genes to eluci. date the etiological diagnosis of GHD. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 5076-5084, 2002)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available