4.6 Article

A sensitive, quantitative assay for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integration

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 21, Pages 10942-10950

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.21.10942-10950.2002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL03984] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K08 AI50458, K08 AI050458, R01 AI46942, 1P30 AI 45008, P30 AI045008] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative methods to measure human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integration promise to be important tools in dissecting the mechanisms whereby latent reservoirs of provirus are established, most notably in the resting T cells of patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. Here we describe a fluorescence-monitored, nested PCR assay that is able to quantify the relatively rare integration events that occur within these cells. Following DNA extraction, a nonkinetic preamplification step is performed with primers that bind genomic Alu elements and HIV-1 gag sequences, under conditions where primers, deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and enzyme are not limiting. This is followed by a kinetic PCR that quantitates HIV-1 long terminal repeat sequences. A T-cell-based integration standard which reflects the randomness of HIV-1 integration is also described. The assay is 10 to 100 times more sensitive than previously reported quantitative Alu PCR-based integration assays. It is specific for integration events, since no proviruses are detected in cells infected either in the presence of an integrase inhibitor or with an integrase-deficient virus. This method promises to provide important new insights into the processes underlying the accumulation and persistence of latent HIV-1 reservoirs and may eventually be useful clinically in monitoring the eradication of latent virus by novel therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available