4.6 Article

Exploring the spectral properties of faint hard X-ray sources with XMM-Newton

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 394, Issue 3, Pages 835-849

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021235

Keywords

galaxies : active; X-rays : galaxies; X-rays : diffuse background

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a spectroscopic study of 41 hard X-ray sources detected serendipitously with high significance (>5sigma in the 2-10 keV band) in seven EPIC performance/verification phase observations. The large collecting area of EPIC allows us to explore the spectral properties of these faint hard X-ray sources with 2 < F2-10 < 80 x 10(-14) erg cm(-2) s(-1) even though the length of the exposures are modest (similar to 20 ks). Optical identifications are available for 21 sources of our sample. Using a simple power law plus Galactic absorption model we find an average value of the photon index Gamma similar to 1.6-1.7, broadly consistent with recent measurements made at similar fluxes with ASCA and with Chandra stacked spectral analyses. We find that 31 out of 41 sources are well fitted by this simple model and only eight sources require absorption in excess of the Galactic value. Interestingly enough, one third of these absorbed sources are broad line objects, though with moderate column densities. Two sources in the sample are X-ray bright optically quiet galaxies and show flat X-ray spectra. Comparing our observational results with those expected from standard synthesis models of the cosmic X-ray background (CXB) we find a fraction of unabsorbed to absorbed sources larger than predicted by theoretical models at our completeness limit of F2-10 similar to 5 x 10(14) erg cm(-2) s(-1). The results presented here illustrate well how wide-angle surveys performed with EPIC on board XMM-Newton allow population studies of interesting and unusual sources to be made as well as enabling constraints to be placed on some input parameters for synthesis models of the CXB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available