4.3 Article

Estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk: the Women's Health Study (United States)

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 847-854

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020617415381

Keywords

breast cancer; estrogen; menopause; progesterone; women

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-47988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-43851] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [AG00158] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: While there is substantial evidence that unopposed estrogen use increases the risk of breast cancer, there are limited data from epidemiologic studies on the impact of estrogen-progestin combinations. We therefore examined estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study. Methods: We investigated postmenopausal hormone (PMH) use among 17,835 apparently healthy postmenopausal women aged greater than or equal to45 years, and followed them prospectively for an average of 5.9 years. Breast cancer occurred in 411 women. Results: The multivariate relative risks of all breast cancer associated with never use of PMH, use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), and use of estrogen-progestin replacement therapy (HRT) were 1.00 (referent), 0.96 (95% CI 0.65-1.42), and 1.37 (95% CI 1.05-1.78). The increase in risk among users of HRT was largely limited to those women who had used estrogen-progestin replacement therapy for five years or more, and to those women who were on continuous rather than cyclic progestin combinations. Higher doses of estrogen, but not progestin, were associated with increased breast cancer risk, compared with lower doses. Conclusions: These prospective data suggest that use of estrogen-progestin replacement therapy imparts an increased risk of breast cancer in comparison with never use of PMH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available