4.6 Article

Adult height after GH therapy in 188 Ullrich-Turner syndrome patients:: results of the German IGLU Follow-up Study 2001

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages 625-633

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1470625

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the factors influencing true adult height (HT) after long-term (from 198 7 to 2000) GH treatment in Ultrich-Turner syndrome (UTS) based on modalities conceived in the 1980s. Design: Out of 347 near-adult (>16 years) patients from 96 German centres, whose longitudinal growth was documented within KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database), 188 (45, X 59%; bone age >15 years) were available for further anthropometric measurements. Results: At a median GH dose of 0.88 (10th/90th percentiles: 0.47/1.06) IU/kg per week, a gain of 6.0 (-1.3/+13) cm above the projected adult height was recorded. Variables were recorded at GH start, after I year GH, puberty onset, and last visit on GH therapy. At these visits, the median ages were 11.7, 12.7, 14.2, 16.6 and 18.7 years; and median heights, 0.4, 1.1, 1.7, 1.7 and 1.3 SDS (UTS) respectively. Height gain (DeltaHT) after GH discontinuation was 1.5 cm. Total DeltaHT correlated (P < 0.001) negatively with bone age and HT SDS at GH start, but positively with DeltaHT after the first year, AHT at puberty onset, and GH duration. Final HT correlated (P < 0.001) positively with HT at GH start, first-year AHT, and HT at puberty onset. Body mass index increased slightly (P < 0.05), with values at start and adult follow-up correlating highly (R = 0.70, P < 0.001). No major side effects of GH occurred. Conclusions: GH dosages conceived in the 1980s are safe but too low for most UTS patients. HT gain and height are determined by age and HT at GH start. Height gain during the first year on GH is indicative of overall height gain. After spontaneous or induced puberty, little gain in height occurs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available