4.6 Article

Ubiquitous ram pressure stripping in the Coma cluster of galaxies

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 618, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833427

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: clusters: individual: Coma; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: individual: J125750.2+281013; galaxies: individual: J125757.7+280342; galaxies: individual: J125756.7+275930

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the detection of H alpha trails behind three new intermediate-mass irregular galaxies in the NW outskirts of the nearby cluster of galaxies Abell 1656 (Coma). Hints that these galaxies possess an extended component were found in earlier, deeper H alpha observations carried out with the Subaru telescope. However the lack of a simultaneous r-band exposure, together with the presence of strong stellar ghosts in the Subaru images, prevented us from quantifying the detections. We therefore devoted one full night of H alpha observation to each of the three galaxies using the San Pedro Martir 2.1 m telescope. One-sided tails of H alpha emission of 10-20 kpc projected size were detected, suggesting an ongoing ram pressure stripping event. We added these 3 new sources of extended ionized gas to the 12 previously found, NGC 4848, and NGC 4921 whose ram pressure stripping is certified by HI asymmetry. This brings the number sources with H alpha trails to 17 gaseous tails out of 27 (63%) late-type galaxies (LTG) members of the Coma cluster with direct evidence of ram pressure stripping. The 27 LTG galaxies, among these the 17 with extended H alpha tails, have kinematic properties that are different from the rest of the early-type galaxy population of the core of the Coma cluster, as they deviate in the phase-space diagram vertical bar Delta V vertical bar/sigma versus r/R-200.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available