4.4 Article

Evaluation of gastric motor activity in the elderly by electrogastrography and the 13C-acetate breath test

Journal

GERONTOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 381-386

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000065500

Keywords

gastric motility; gastric emptying; electrogastrography; C-13-acetate breath test; elderly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Elderly people frequently have symptoms of fullness and appetite loss due to impaired gastric motor activity. These symptoms may cause malnutrition, immunosuppression and other complications. Objective: The effects of aging and daily activity on gastric motility in the elderly were investigated by electrogastrography and the C-13-acetate breath test. Methods: We enrolled seven active elderly subjects (active elderly group), seven elderly subjects staying at a geriatric facility who had reduced mental and physical capacities (inactive elderly group) and seven healthy young volunteers (young group). Electrogastrography was recorded before and after ingestion of a C-13-acetate-mixed liquid meal. Expired air was sampled every 10 min after the meal to measure the (CO2)-C-13 concentration. Results: The ratio of the incidence of the 3-cpm wave (gastric intrinsic frequency) during the postprandial period compared to the fasting state was reduced in both elderly groups compared to young subjects, and the reduction was greater in the inactive elderly than in the active elderly group. The ratio of the amplitude of the peak frequency during the postprandial period to that in the fasting state (power ratio) was also lower in the elderly groups. The time of peak (CO2)-C-13 expiration was delayed in the active elderly and more so in the inactive elderly group. Conclusion: Postprandial peristalsis and gastric contractile force are reduced in the elderly, and gastric emptying is delayed indicating a reduction in gastric motor activity. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available