3.9 Article

Children's food preferences: A longitudinal analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages 1638-1647

Publisher

AMER DIETETIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90349-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To compare children's food preferences longitudinally and identify factors related to food preferences. Design Mothers completed the Food Preference Questionnaire for children at 2 to 3 years of age (T-1), 4 years (T-2), and 8 years (T-3) and for themselves at T-1 and T3. Both groups completed a Food Neophobia Scale at T3. Subjects 70 child/mother pairs who had participated continuously in the longitudinal study. Statistical analyses performed Changes in food preferences over time were tested with paired t tests and correlations. Consistency percentages were calculated by summing the consistent matches (like/like) for each food between two time periods. Similarly, concordance percentages were calculated for child/mother pairs by summing the concordant matches for each food. General linear models were developed to identify influences on children's food preferences. Results Although children liked most foods, the number of liked foods did not change significantly during the 5 to 5.7 years of the study. The strongest predictors of the number of foods liked at age 8 years (R-2=0.74) were the number liked at 4 years (P<.0001) and the food neophobia score (P=.0003). Newly tasted foods were more likely to be accepted between T-1 and T-2 than T2 and T3. Mothers' and children's food preferences were significantly but moderately related. Foods disliked by mothers tended not to be offered to children. Applications/Conclusions The important role of children's early food preferences is confirmed by this study. Mothers influence children via their own preferences, which may limit foods offered to children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available