4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Determination of anaerobic threshold in rats using the lactate minimum test

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 1389-1394

Publisher

ASSOC BRAS DIVULG CIENTIFICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2002001100018

Keywords

rat; blood lactate; lactate minimum test; maximal lactate steady state

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The break point of the curve of blood lactate vs exercise load has been called anaerobic threshold (AT) and is considered to be an important indicator of endurance exercise capacity in human subjects. There are few studies of AT determination in animals. We describe a protocol for AT determination by the lactate minimum test in rats during swimming exercise. The test is based on the premise that during an incremental exercise test, and after a bout of maximal. exercise, blood lactate decreases to a minimum and then increases again. This minimum value indicates the intensity of the AT. Adult male (90 days) Wistar rats adapted to swimming for 2 weeks were used. The initial state of lactic acidosis was obtained by making the animals jump into the water and swim while carrying a load equivalent to 50% of body weight for 6 min (30-s exercise interrupted by a 30-s rest). After a 9-min rest, blood was collected and the incremental swimming test was started. The test consisted of swimming while supporting loads of 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and 7.0% of body weight. Each exercise load lasted 5 min and was followed by a 30-s rest during which blood samples were taken. The blood lactate minimum was determined from a zero-gradient tangent to a spline function fitting the blood lactate vs workload curve. AT was estimated to be 4.95 +/- 0.10% of body weight while interpolated blood lactate was 7.17 +/- 0.16 mmol/l. These results suggest the application of AT determination in animal studies concerning metabolism during exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available