4.6 Review

A Hubble Space Telescope survey of the mid-ultraviolet morphology of nearby galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 143, Issue 1, Pages 113-158

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/341556

Keywords

galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : interactions; galaxies : irregular; galaxies : peculiar; galaxies : spiral; ultraviolet : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a systematic imaging survey of 37 nearby galaxies observed with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) in the mid-UV F300W filter, centered at 2930 Angstrom, as well as in the I-band (F814W) filter at 8230 Angstrom. Eleven of these galaxies were also imaged in the F255W filter, centered at 2550 Angstrom. Our sample is carefully selected to include galaxies of sufficiently small radius and high predicted mid-UV surface brightness to be detectable with WFPC2 in one orbit and covers a wide range of Hubble types and inclinations. The mid-UV (2000-3200 Angstrom) spans the gap between ground-based UBVR(IJHK) images, which are available or were acquired for the current study, and far-UV images available from the Astro/UIT missions for 15 galaxies in our sample. The first qualitative results from our study are as follows: 1. Early-type galaxies show a significant decrease in surface brightness going from the red to the mid-UV, reflecting the absence of a dominant young stellar population and in some cases the presence of significant (central) dust lanes. Galaxies that are early types in the optical show a variety of morphologies in the mid-UV that can lead to a different morphological classification, although not necessarily as later type. Some early-type galaxies become dominated by a blue nuclear feature or a point source in the mid-UV, e.g., as a result of the presence of a Seyfert nucleus or a LINER. This is in part due to our mid-UV surface brightness selection, but it also suggests that part of the strong apparent evolution of weak AGNs in early-type galaxies may be due to surface brightness dimming of their UV-faint stellar population, which renders the early-type host galaxies invisible at intermediate to higher redshifts. 2. About half of the mid-type spiral and star-forming galaxies appear as a later morphological type in the mid-UV, as Astro/UIT also found primarily in the far-UV. Sometimes these differences are dramatic (e.g., NGC 6782 shows a spectacular ring of hot stars in the mid-UV). However, not all mid-type spiral galaxies look significantly different in the mid-UV. Their mid-UV images show a considerable range in the scale and surface brightness of individual star-forming regions. Almost without exception, the mid-type spirals in our sample have their small bulges bisected by a dust lane, which often appears to be connected to the inner spiral arm structure. 3. The majority of the heterogeneous subset of late-type, irregular, peculiar, and merging galaxies display F300W morphologies that are similar to those seen in F814W, but with important differences due to recognizable dust features absorbing the bluer light and to hot stars, star clusters, and star formation ridges that are bright in the mid-UV. Less than one-third of the galaxies classified as late type in the optical appear sufficiently different in the mid-UV to result in a different classification. Our HST mid-UV survey of nearby galaxies shows that, when observed in the rest-frame mid-UV, early- to mid-type galaxies are more likely to be misclassified as later types than late-type galaxies are to be misclassified as earlier types. This is because the later type galaxies are dominated by the same young and hot stars in all filters from the mid-UV to the red and so have a smaller morphological K-correction than true earlier type galaxies. The morphological K-correction can thus explain part, but certainly not all, of the excess faint blue late-type galaxies seen in deep HST fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available