4.6 Article

Size distribution, growth and inter-year variation in sex expression of Bischofia javanica, an invasive tree

Journal

ANNALS OF BOTANY
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 599-605

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf231

Keywords

Bischofia javanica (Blume); sex ratio; dioecy; sex change; invasive tree; size distribution; growth rate; subtropical oceanic island

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flowering activity and sex expression of Bischofia javanica Blume were investigated for 3 years. B. javanica is an invasive dioecious tree of subtropical forests on the Bonin Islands in the western Pacific of Japan. The sex ratio showed a significant male bias (1.25-2.33). Smaller trees were significantly male biased, whereas larger trees showed no significant difference in sex expression, suggesting that males tend to be more precocious in sexual reproduction. We found evidence for sex changes in B. javanica; these have not been reported previously. Most of the 1653 census trees remained non-flowering (59.1%); 3.7% of them showed sex changes, and the percentage of trees repeatedly flowering as males and females was 10.5 and 3.4%, respectively. Sex changes were observed in both directions but a larger percentage of male trees became female. Flowering frequency and sex expression were significantly related to tree size (i.e. diameter at breast height). Over the 3 years, trees that were consistent females were the largest; inconsistent trees (switching sex between years) were intermediate in size, whereas consistent males were the smallest. There were no significant differences in relative growth rate (RGR) among trees of different sex or flowering frequencies. These results suggest that the maintenance of female reproduction is not related to changes in RGR of diameter but to flowering frequency or the reversal to the male form, dependent upon the internal resource status of individual trees. (C) 2002 Annals of Botany Company.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available