4.6 Article

Luminosity function from dedicated SDSS-III and MMT data of quasars in 0.7 < z < 4.0 selected with a new approach

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 551, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220379

Keywords

quasars: general; dark energy; surveys

Funding

  1. David and Lucile Packard Fellowship
  2. NSF [AST 08-06861, AST 11-07682]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-08-BLAN-0222]
  7. [ANR-11-JS04-011-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a measurement of the quasar luminosity function in the range 0.68 < z < 4 down to extinction corrected magnitude g(dered) = 22.5, using a simple and well understood target selection technique based on the time-variability of quasars. The completeness of our sample was derived directly from a control sample of quasars, without requiring complex simulations of quasar light-curves or colors. A total of 1877 quasar spectra were obtained from dedicated programs on the Sloan telescope (as part of the SDSS-III/BOSS survey) and on the Multiple Mirror Telescope. They allowed us to derive the quasar luminosity function. It agrees well with results previously published in the redshift range 0.68 < z < 2.6. Our deeper data allow us to extend the measurement to z = 4. We measured quasar densities to g(dered) < 22.5, obtaining 30 QSO per deg(2) at z < 1, 99 QSO per deg(2) for 1 < z < 2.15, and 47 QSO per deg(2) at z > 2.15. Using pure luminosity evolution models, we fitted our LF measurements and predicted quasar number counts as a function of redshift and observed magnitude. These predictions are useful inputs for future cosmology surveys such as those relying on the observation of quasars to measure baryon acoustic oscillations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available