4.6 Article

The low-extinction afterglow in the solar-metallicity host galaxy of γ-ray burst 110918A

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 556, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220968

Keywords

gamma-ray burst: general; gamma-ray burst: individual: 110918A; ISM: general; galaxies: abundances; galaxies: photometry; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. DFG [HA 1850/28-1, SA 2001/1-1, SA 2001/2-1]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant Fellowship
  4. European Commission under the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship Programme
  5. Danish National Research Foundation
  6. MPG [M.FE.A.Ext 00003]
  7. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch-Dienst (DAAD)
  8. Dark Cosmology Centre
  9. STFC
  10. DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe
  11. National Science Foundation [AST-1107973]
  12. [AYA2012-39362-C02-02]
  13. [AYA2011-24780/ESP]
  14. [AYA2009-14000-C03-01/ESP]
  15. [AYA2010-21887-C04-01]
  16. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001719/1, ST/K001000/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  17. STFC [ST/K001000/1, PP/E002064/1, ST/I001719/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  19. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1107973] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galaxies selected through long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) could be of fundamental importance when mapping the star formation history out to the highest redshifts. Before using them as efficient tools in the early Universe, however, the environmental factors that govern the formation of GRBs need to be understood. Metallicity is theoretically thought to be a fundamental driver in GRB explosions and energetics, but it is still, even after more than a decade of extensive studies, not fully understood. This is largely related to two phenomena: a dust-extinction bias, which prevented high-mass and thus likely high-metallicity GRB hosts from being detected in the first place, and a lack of efficient instrumentation, which limited spectroscopic studies, including metallicity measurements, to the low-redshift end of the GRB host population. The subject of this work is the very energetic GRB 110918A (E-gamma,E-iso = 1.9 x 10(54) erg), for which we measure a redshift of z = 0.984. GRB 110918A gave rise to a luminous afterglow with an intrinsic spectral slope of beta = 0.70, which probed a sight-line with little extinction (A(V)(GRB) = 0.16 mag) and soft X-ray absorption (N-H,N-X = (1.6 +/- 0.5) x 10(21) cm(-2)) typical of the established distributions of afterglow properties. However, photometric and spectroscopic follow-up observations of the galaxy hosting GRB 110918A, including optical/near-infrared photometry with the Gamma-Ray burst Optical Near-infrared Detector and spectroscopy with the Very Large Telescope/X-shooter, reveal an all but average GRB host in comparison to the z similar to 1 galaxies selected through similar afterglows to date. It has a large spatial extent with a half-light radius of R-1/2 similar to 10 kpc, the highest stellar mass for z < 1.9 (log(M-*/M-circle dot) = 10.68 +/- 0.16), and an H alpha-based star formation rate of SFRH alpha = 41(-16)(+28) M-circle dot yr(-1). We measure a gas-phase extinction of A(V)(gas) similar to 1.8 mag through the Balmer decrement and one of the largest host-integrated metallicities ever of around solar using the well-constrained ratios of [N II]/H alpha and [N II]/[O II] (12 + log (O/H) = 8.93 +/- 0.13 and 8.85(-0.18)(+0.14), respectively). This presents one of the very few robust metallicity measurements of GRB hosts at z similar to 1, and establishes that GRB hosts at z similar to 1 can also be very metal rich. It conclusively rules out a metallicity cut-off in GRB host galaxies and argues against an anti-correlation between metallicity and energy release in GRBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available