4.6 Article

Spectrophotometric time series of SN 2011fe from the Nearby Supernova Factory

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 554, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201221008

Keywords

supernovae: individual: SN 2011fe

Funding

  1. Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
  3. CNRS/IN2P3
  4. CNRS/INSU
  5. PNCG
  6. DFG through TRR33 The Dark Universe
  7. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  8. Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. Lyon Institute of Origins [ANR-10-LABX-66]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present 32 epochs of optical (3300-9700 angstrom) spectrophotometric observations of the nearby quintessential normal type Ia supernova (SN Ia) SN 2011fe in the galaxy M101, extending from -15 to +97 d with respect to B-band maximum, obtained by the Nearby Supernova Factory collaboration. SN 2011fe is the closest (mu = 29.04) and brightest (B-max = 9.94 mag) SN Ia observed since the advent of modern large scale programs for the intensive periodic followup of supernovae. Both synthetic light curve measurements and spectral feature analysis attest to the normality of SN 2011fe. There is very little evidence for reddening in its host galaxy. The homogeneous calibration, intensive time sampling, and high signal-to-noise ratio of the data set make it unique. Thus it is ideal for studying the physics of SN Ia explosions in detail, and for furthering the use of SNe Ia as standardizable candles for cosmology. Several such applications are shown, from the creation of a bolometric light curve and measurement of the Ni-56 mass, to the simulation of detection thresholds for unburned carbon, direct comparisons with other SNe Ia, and existing spectral templates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available