4.7 Article

Multicentric inflammation in epicardial coronary arteries of patients dying of acute myocardial infarction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 1579-1588

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02376-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We sought to test the hypothesis of whether inflammatory cell infiltration in patients dying of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a multifocal event involving multiple coronary branches. BACKGROUND Coronary instability is thought to reflect local disruption of a single vulnerable plaque. However, previous postmortem studies have not addressed the question of whether activation of inflammatory cells, particularly T lymphocytes, is limited to the culprit lesion only or rather diffuse in the coronary circulation. METHODS We performed a systematic flow cytometric study in three groups of autopsied patients (group 1 = acute MI; group 2 = old MI; group 3 = no ischemic heart disease). Cell suspensions of enzymatically digested coronary arteries were stained for flow cytometry with CD3, CD68, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR antibodies. RESULTS The coronary plaques showed: 1) a higher proportion of inflammatory cells in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3; 2) a higher percentage of T lymphocytes in group 1 than in group 2 (11.67 +/- 0.70% vs. 5.67 +/- 0.74%, p = 0.001) and in group 2 than in group 3 (p = 0.008); and 3) diffuse cell activation in the whole coronary tree of group 1, but not of group 2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that lymphocytes may play a key role in coronary instability by determining activation of various cellular types throughout the coronary circulation. Activated T lymphocytes and their products may well represent a new target in both the treatment and prevention of acute coronary syndromes. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available