4.6 Article

Vigorous leisure activity through women's adult life - The Women's Health Initiative Observational Cohort Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue 10, Pages 945-953

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwf132

Keywords

Asian Americans; Blacks; Hispanic Americans; Indians, North American; leisure activities; women

Funding

  1. WHI NIH HHS [N01-WH-4-2119] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study described differences in vigorous activity participation recalled across the life span, assessed whether reports of past vigorous activity were associated with current participation, and examined factors associated with participation in current vigorous activity among women. After the exclusion of women aged 50-54 years, the study population included 71,837 multiethnic postmenopausal women aged 55-79 years who were participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Cohort Study, 1993-1998. Vigorous activity was assessed retrospectively for ages 18, 35, and 50 years and currently at enrollment into the study (median age, 65 years). Current participation in vigorous activity (greater than or equal to3 days/week) was low and consistent across racial/ethnic groups (13-16%). The prevalence of vigorous activity declined with age, with the largest decrease in vigorous activity occurring after age 50 years for all racial/ethnic groups. Current vigorous activity was generally higher among women with a lower body mass index, not currently smoking, in excellent general health, and of higher socioeconomic status across racial/ethnic groups. These data suggest that a lower prevalence of vigorous activity in the postmenopausal period is part of a complex of health-related attitudes and behaviors that transcends race/ethnicity. The perimenopausal period may be a critical juncture at which targeted and tailored interventions may help to achieve maintenance of physical activity into the postmenopausal period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available