4.6 Article

TeV cosmic-ray proton and helium spectra in the myriad model

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 555, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321202

Keywords

catalogs; cosmic rays; pulsars: general

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINNs Consolider-Ingenio Program [CPAN CSD2007-00042]
  2. MICINN [FPA2009-08958]
  3. Community of Madrid [HEPHACOS S2009/ESP-1473]
  4. European Union under the Marie Curie-ITN program [PITN-GA-2009-237920]
  5. Research Professorship (A) of Ewha Womans University
  6. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  7. Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0090848]
  8. LAPTh
  9. China Scholarship Council [2009491052]
  10. Institut universitaire de France (IUF)
  11. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0090848] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Recent measurements of cosmic ray proton and helium spectra show a hardening above a few hundred GeV. This excess is hard to understand in the framework of the conventional models of Galactic cosmic ray production and propagation. Aims. We propose here to explain this anomaly by the presence of local sources (myriad model). Methods. Cosmic ray propagation is described as a diffusion process taking place inside a two-zone magnetic halo. We calculate the proton and helium fluxes at the Earth between 50 GeV and 100 TeV. As an improvement over a similar analysis, we consistently derive these fluxes by taking both local and remote sources for which a unique injection rate is assumed into account. Results. We find cosmic ray propagation parameters compatible with B/C measurements for which the proton and helium spectra agree remarkably with the PAMELA and CREAM measurements over four decades in energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available