4.7 Article

Leukemia proto-oncoprotein MLL is proteolytically processed into 2 fragments with opposite transcriptional properties

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 3710-3718

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1015

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA55029] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MLL (mixed lineage leukemia; also ALL-1 or HRX) Is a proto-oncogene that Is mutated In a variety of acute leukemias. Its product is normally required for the maintenance of Hox gene expression during embryogenesis and hematopoiesis through molecular mechanisms that remain poorly defined. Here we demonstrate that MLL (mixed lineage leukemia) is proteolytically processed Into 2 fragments (MLLN and MLLC) that display opposite transcriptional properties and form an intramolecular MLL complex in vivo. Proteolytic cleavage occurs at 2 amino acids (D2666 and D2718) within a consensus processing sequence (QXD/GZDD, where X Is a hydrophobic amino acid and Z Is an alanine or a valine) that is conserved in TRX, the Drosophila homolog of MLL, and in the MLL-related protein MLL2, suggesting that processing Is important for MLL function. Processed MLLN and MLLC associate with each other via N-terminal (1253-2254 amino acids) and G-terminal (3602-3742 amino acids) intramolecular interaction domains. MLL processing occurs rapidly within a few hours after translation and is followed by the phosphorylation of MLLC. MLLN displays transcriptional repression activity, whereas MLLC has strong transcriptional activation properties. Leukemia-associated MLL fusion proteins lack the MLL processing sites, do not undergo cleavage, and are unable to interact with MLLC. These observations suggest that posttranslational modifications of MLL may participate in regulating its activity as a transcription factor and that this aspect of its function is perturbed by leukemogenic fusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available