4.6 Article

Bioreduction and biocrystallization of palladium by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans NCIMB 8307

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 369-379

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10369

Keywords

palladium reduction; palladium recovery; Desulfovibrio desulfuricans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reduction of Pd(II) to Pd(0) was accelerated by using the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans NCIMB 8307 at the expense of formate or H-2 as electron donors at pH 2-7. With formate no reduction occurred at pH 2, but with H-2 50% of the activity was retained at pH 2, with the maximum rate (1.3-1.4 mu mol min(-1) mg dry cells(-1)) seen at pH 3-7, which was similar to the rate with formate at neutral pH. Excess nitrate was inhibitory to Pd(II) reduction using formate, but not H-2. Chloride ion was inhibitory as low as 100 mM using formate but with H-2 only ca. 25% inhibition was observed at 500 mM Cl- and H-2 was concluded to be the electron donor of choice for the potential remediation of industrial wastes. Deposited Pd was visible on the cells using transmission and scanning electron microscopy and analysis by energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDAX) identified the deposit as Pd, confirmed as Pd(0) by X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRD). The crystal size of the biodeposited Pd(0) was determined to be only 50% of the size of Pd(0) crystals manufactured chemically from Pd(II) at the expense of H-2 and, unlike the chemically manufactured material, the biocrystal size was independent of the pH. The biological Pd(0) functioned as a superior chemical catalyst in a test reaction which liberated hydrogen from hypophosphite. Pd, and also Pt and Rh, could be recovered by resting cell suspensions. under H-2 from an industrial processing wastewater, suggesting a possible future application of bioprocessing technology for precious metals. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available