4.7 Article

Prevalence of male and female patterns of early ventricular repolarization in the normal ECG of males and females from childhood to old age

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 10, Pages 1870-1876

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02492-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to establish the cause of electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern differences between genders. BACKGROUND The male and female patterns of early ventricular repolarization in normal ECGs differ from each other. The male pattern displays a higher J-point amplitude and increased ST angle. The distribution of these patterns between genders has not been studied. METHODS Normal ECGs of 529 males and 544 females, age 5 to 96 years, were subdivided into nine age groups in each gender. We designated the pattern as female if the J point was <0.1 mV in each of the leads V-1 to V-4, and as male if the J point was greater than or equal to0.1 mV and the ST angle greater than or equal to20degrees in at least one of the V-1 to V-4 leads; the pattern was indeterminate if the J point was greater than or equal to0.1 mV and the ST angle was <20degrees. RESULTS Distribution of patterns was significantly different between genders (p < 0.001). In females, the patterns were distributed similarly from puberty to advanced age with about 80% prevalence of the female pattern. In males, the male pattern prevalence increased at puberty, reached 91% in the age group of 17 to 24 years and declined gradually with advancing age to 1496 in the oldest males. The prevalence of indeterminate pattern was about 10% in both genders. Patterns were unchanged in 95% of 493 subjects who had ECGs recorded at separate times or at different heart rates. CONCLUSIONS Gender differences in early ventricular repolarization were caused by age-dependent changes in prevalence of the male pattern. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available