4.6 Article

The XMM deep survey in the CDF-S II. A 9-20 keV selection of heavily obscured active galaxies at z > 1.7

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 546, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220036

Keywords

galaxies: active; X-rays: galaxies

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [AYA2010-21782-C03-01]
  2. NASA ADP grant [NNX10AC99G]
  3. [ASI-INAFI/009/10/0]
  4. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  5. NASA [135881, NNX10AC99G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results on a search of heavily obscured active galaxies z > 1.7 using the rest-frame 9-20 keV excess for X-ray sources detected in the deep XMM-CDFS survey. Out of 176 sources selected with the conservative detection criteria (>8 sigma) in the first source catalogue of Ranalli et al. (in prep.), 46 objects lie in the redshift range of interest with the median redshift (z) over tilde similar or equal to 2.5. Their typical rest-frame 10-20 keV luminosity is 10(44) erg s(-1), as observed. Among optically faint objects that lack spectroscopic redshift, four were found to be strongly absorbed X-ray sources, and the enhanced Fe K emission or absorption features in their X-ray spectra were used to obtain X-ray spectroscopic redshifts. Using the X-ray colour-colour diagram based on the rest-frame 3-5 keV, 5-9 keV, and 9-20 keV bands, seven objects were selected for their 9-20 keV excess and were found to be strongly absorbed X-ray sources with column density of N-H >= 0.6 x 10(24) cm(-2), including two possible Compton thick sources. While they are emitting at quasar luminosity, similar to 3/4 of the sample objects are found to be absorbed by N-H > 10(22) cm(-2). A comparison with local AGN at the matched luminosity suggests an increasing trend of the absorbed source fraction for high-luminosity AGN towards high redshifts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available