4.8 Article

High incidence of epithelial cancers in mice deficient for DNA polymerase δ proofreading

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.232340999

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K08 CA72731] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [U01 ES11045, R01 ES09927, U01 ES011045, R01 ES09927-S1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations are a hallmark of cancer. Normal cells minimize spontaneous mutations through the combined actions of polymerase base selectivity, 3' --> 5' exonucleolytic proofreading, mismatch correction, and DNA damage repair. To determine the consequences of defective proofreading in mammals, we created mice with a point mutation (D400A) in the proofreading domain of DNA polymerase delta (poldelta, encoded by the Pold1 gene). We show that this mutation inactivates the 3' --> 5' exonuclease of poldelta and causes a mutator and cancer phenotype in a recessive manner. By 18 months of age, 94% of homozygous Pold1(D400A/D400A) mice developed cancer and died (median survival = 10 months). In contrast, only 3-4% of Pold1(+/D400A) and Pold1(+/+) mice developed cancer in this time frame. Of the 66 tumors arising in 49 Pold1(D400A/D400A) mice, 40 were epithelial in origin (carcinomas), 24 were mesenchymal (lymphomas and sarcomas), and two were composite (teratomas); one-third of these animals developed tumors in more than one tissue. Skin squamous cell carcinoma was the most common tumor type, occurring in 60% of all Pold1(D400A/D400A) mice and in 90% of those surviving beyond 8 months of age. These data show that poldelta proofreading suppresses spontaneous tumor development and strongly suggest that unrepaired DNA polymerase errors contribute to carcinogenesis. Mice deficient in poldelta proofreading provide a tractable model to study mechanisms of epithelial tumorigenesis initiated by a mutator phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available