4.8 Article

Methylation, expression, and mutation analysis of the cell cycle control genes in human brain tumors

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 21, Issue 54, Pages 8372-8378

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206031

Keywords

Methylation; p14(ARF); p15(INK4B); p16(INK4A); RB; brain tumors; p53 mutation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylation status of the p(15INK4B), p16(INK4A), p14(ARF) and retinoblastoma (RB) genes was studied using methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in 85 human brain tumors of various subtypes and four normal brain samples. These genes play an important role in the control of the cell cycle. Twenty-four out of 85 cases (28%) had at least one of these genes methylated. The frequency of p14ARF methylation was 15 out of 85 (18%) cases, and the expression of p14(ARF) in methylated gliomas was significantly lower than in unmethylated gliomas. The incidence of methylation of p15(INK4B), p16(INK4A) and RB gene was 4%, 7%, and 4%, respective . Samples with p14(ARF) methylation did not have p16(INK4A) methylation even though both genes physically overlap. None of the target genes was methylated in the normal brain samples. In addition, the p53 gene was mutated in 19 out of 85 (22%) samples as determined by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and DNA sequencing. Thirty out of 85 (35%) brain tumors had either a p53 mutation or methylation of p14(ARF). Also, the p14(ARF) expression in p53 wild-type gliomas was lower than levels in p53 mutated gliomas. This finding is consistent with wild-type p53 being able to autoregulate its levels by down-regulating expression of p14(ARF). In summary, inactivation of the apoptosis pathway that included the p14(ARF) and p53 genes by hypermethylation and mutation, respectively, occurred frequently in human brain tumors. Down-regulation of p14(ARF) in gliomas was associated with hypermethylation of its promoter and the presence of a wild-type p53 in these samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available