4.6 Article

Preparation and properties of waterborne polyurethane-urea anionomers. I. The influence of the degree of neutralization and counterion

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 86, Issue 9, Pages 2375-2383

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.11249

Keywords

waterborne; polyurethanes; neutralization agent; hydrogen bonding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two series of waterborne polyurethane-urea anionomers were prepared by a polyaddition reaction with isophorone diisocyanate, poly(tetramethylene oxide) glycol (weight-average molecular weight = 1000), dimethylol propionic acid (DMPA), and ethylene diamine as chain extenders. Triethylamine (TEA) or 28:1 mol/mol ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH)/cupric hydroxide [Cu(OH)(2)] was used as a neutralization agent [NH(C2H5)(3)(+) or NH4+/Cu2+ counterion] for the pendant COOH group of DMPA. The effects of the degree of neutralization and counterion on the particle size of the dispersions, the conductivity, and the antibacterial and mechanical properties of polyurethaneurea anionomer films were investigated. The particle sizes of the two sample series dispersions decreased with an increasing degree of neutralization. Aqueous dispersions of polyurethane-urea anionomers with particle sizes of 30-120 nm were stable for about 3 months. By infrared spectroscopy, it was found that TEA-based samples (T series) had higher fractions of hydrogen-bonded carbonyl groups in the ordered region than NH4OH/Cu(OH)(2)-based samples (S series). However, the fractions of hydrogen-bonded carbonyl groups in the disordered region of the S-series samples were higher than those of the T-series samples. The conductivities of the S-series film samples were higher than those of the T-series samples. However, the T-series film samples commonly had higher tensile strengths and initial moduli than the S-series samples. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available