4.6 Article

Insight into the catalytic mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A -: Studies of toxin interaction with eukaryotic elongation factor-2

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 48, Pages 46669-46675

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M206916200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The molecular nature of the protein-protein interactions between the catalytic domain from Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A (PE24H) and its protein substrate, eukaryotic elongation factor-2 (eEF-2) were probed using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer method. Single cysteine mutant proteins of PE24H were prepared and site-specifically labeled with the donor fluorophore IAEDANS (5-(2-iodoacetylaminoethylamino)-1-napthalenesulfonic acid), whereas eEF-2 was labeled with the acceptor fluorophore fluorescein. The association was found to be independent of ionic strength and of the co-substrate, NAD(+) but dependent upon pH. The lack of requirement for NAD(+) to produce the toxin-eEF-2 complex demonstrates that the catalytic process is a random order mechanism, thereby disputing the current model. The previously observed pH dependence for catalytic function can be assigned to the toxin-eEF-2 binding event, as the pH dependence of binding observed in this study showed a strong correlation with enzymatic activity. The ability of the toxin to bind eEF-2 with bound GTP/GDP was assessed using nonhydrolyzable analogues. The results from the substrate binding and catalytic activity experiments indicate that PE24H is able to interact and bind with eEF-2 in all of its guanyl nucleotide-induced conformational states. Thus, the toxin ribosylates eEF-2 regardless of the nucleotide-charged state of eEF-2. These results represent the first detailed characterization of the molecular details and physiological conditions governing this protein-protein interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available