4.6 Article

Role of membrane fluidity in pressure resistance of Escherichia coli NCTC 8164

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 12, Pages 5965-5972

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.5965-5972.2002

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship among growth temperature, membrane fatty acid composition, and pressure resistance was examined in Escherichia coli NCTC 8164. The pressure resistance of exponential-phase cells was maximal in cells grown at 10degreesC and decreased with increasing growth temperatures up to 45degreesC. By contrast, the pressure resistance of stationary-phase cells was lowest in cells grown at 10degreesC and increased with increasing growth temperature, reaching a maximum at 30 to 37degreesC before decreasing at 45degreesC. The proportion of unsaturated fatty acids in the membrane lipids decreased with increasing growth temperature in both exponential- and stationary-phase cells and correlated closely with the melting point of the phospholipids extracted from whole cells examined by differential scanning calorimetry. Therefore, in exponential-phase cells, pressure resistance increased with greater membrane fluidity, whereas in stationary-phase cells, there was apparently no simple relationship between membrane fluidity and pressure resistance. When exponential-phase or stationary-phase cells were pressure treated at different temperatures, resistance in both cell types increased with increasing temperatures of pressurization (between 10 and 30degreesC). Based on the above observations, we propose that membrane fluidity affects the pressure resistance of exponential- and stationary-phase cells in a similar way, but it is the dominant factor in exponential-phase cells whereas in stationary-phase cells, its effects are superimposed on a separate but larger effect of the physiological stationary-phase response that is itself temperature dependent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available