4.8 Article

Hemodynamic and antifibrotic effects of losartan in rats with liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 773-780

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00307-0

Keywords

angiotensin II; angiotensin II receptor antagonist; losartan; portal hypertension; liver fibrosis; hemodynamics; rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: To assess the effects of the early and chronic administration of losartan -a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist- in the prevention of hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension. Methods/Results: (1) In CCl4 rats, losartan at 5 and 10 mg/kg per day significantly decreased portal pressure (-11, - 18%, respectively), splenorenal shunt blood flow (-60, -80%) and liver fibrosis (liver hydroxyproline and area of fibrosis) without significant changes in mortality and mean arterial pressure (MAP). (2) In bile duct ligated (BDL) rats, losartan at 5 mg/kg per day significantly decreased portal pressure (-14%), splenorenal shunt blood flow (-70%) and liver fibrosis. Losartan at 10 mg/kg per day significantly worsened liver and renal functions, mortality and liver fibrosis, without significant changes in portal pressure and splenorenal shunt blood flow. Losartan at 5 and 10 mg/kg per day significantly decreased MAP (-24, -30%). (3) In portal vein ligated (PVL) rats, losartan significantly decreased MAP (-12%) but did not change portal pressure or splenorenal shunt blood flow. Conclusions: In BDL and CCl4 rats, losartan has beneficial effects on splanchnic hemodynamics and liver fibrosis. Losartan might decrease hepatic resistances in fibrotic liver. Losartan decreased MAP except in CCl4 rats. Higher dosage of losartan had deleterious effects in BDL rats. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available