4.6 Article

The strong magnetic field of the large-amplitude β Cephei pulsator V1449 Aquilae

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 531, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117261

Keywords

stars: early-type; stars: rotation; stars: individual: V1449 Aql; stars: magnetic field; stars: oscillations; stars: variables: general

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders
  2. Belspo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. Only for very few beta Cephei stars has the behaviour of the magnetic field been studied over the rotation cycle. During the past two years we have obtained multi-epoch polarimetric spectra of the beta Cephei star V1449 Aql with SOFIN at the Nordic Optical Telescope to search for a rotation period and to constrain the geometry of the magnetic field. Methods. The mean longitudinal magnetic field is measured at 13 different epochs. The new measurements, together with the previous FORS 1 measurements, have been used for the frequency analysis and the characterization of the magnetic field. Results. V1449 Aql so far possesses the strongest longitudinal magnetic field of up to 700G among the beta Cephei stars. The resulting periodogram displays three dominant peaks with the highest peak at f = 0.0720 d(-1) corresponding to a period P = 13(d).893. The magnetic field geometry can likely be described by a centred dipole with a polar magnetic field strength B(d) around 3 kG and an inclination angle beta of the magnetic axis to the rotation axis of 76 +/- 4 degrees. As of today, the strongest longitudinal magnetic fields are detected in the beta Cephei stars V1449 Aql and xi(1) CMa with large radial velocity amplitudes. Their peak-to-peak amplitudes reach similar to 90 km s(-1) and similar to 33 km s(-1), respectively. Concluding, we briefly discuss the position of the currently known eight magnetic beta Cephei and candidate beta Cephei stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available