4.7 Article

Large functional range of steady-state levels of nuclear and mitochondrial transcripts coding for the subunits of the human mitochondrial OXPHOS system

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 1901-1909

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.194102

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have measured, by reverse transcription and real-time quantitative PCR, the steady-state levels of the mitochondrial and nuclear transcripts encoding several subunits of the human oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system, in different normal tissues (muscle, liver, trachea, and kidney) and in cultured cells (normal fibroblasts, 1438 osteosarcoma cells, 14313206 p cells). Five mitochondrial transcripts and nine nuclear transcripts were assessed. The measured amounts of these OXPHOS transcripts in muscle samples corroborated data obtained by others using the serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) method to appraise gene expression in the same type of tissue. Steady-state levels for all the transcripts were found to range over more than two orders of magnitude. Most of the time, the mitochondrial H-strand transcripts were present at higher levels than the nuclear transcripts. The mitochondrial L-strand transcript ND6 was usually present at a low level. Cultured 143B cells contained significantly reduced amounts of mitochondrial transcripts in comparison with the tissue samples. In 14313206 p(o) cells, fully depleted of mitochondrial DNA, the levels of nuclear OXPHOS transcripts were not modified in comparison with the parental cells. This observation indicated that nuclear transcription is not coordinated with mitochondrial transcription. We also observed that in the different tissues and cells, there is a transcriptional coregulation of all the investigated nuclear genes. Nuclear OXPHOS gene expression seems to be finely regulated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available