4.6 Article

Mass-loss rates for transiting exoplanets

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 529, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016356

Keywords

planets and satellites: general; planets and satellites: atmospheres; ultraviolet: planetary systems; ultraviolet: stars; X-rays: stars

Funding

  1. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exoplanets at small orbital distances from their host stars are submitted to intense levels of energetic radiations, X-rays, and extreme ultraviolet (EUV). Depending on the masses and densities of the planets and on the atmospheric heating efficiencies, the stellar energetic inputs can lead to atmospheric mass loss. These evaporation processes are observable in the ultraviolet during planetary transits. The aim of the present work is to quantify the mass-loss rates ((m) over dot), heating efficiencies (eta), and lifetimes for the whole sample of transiting exoplanets, now including hot Jupiters, hot Neptunes, and hot super-Earths. The mass-loss rates and lifetimes are estimated from an energy diagram for exoplanets, which compares the planet gravitational potential energy to the stellar X/EUV energy deposited in the atmosphere. We estimate the mass-loss rates of all detected transiting planets to be within 10(6) to 10(13) g s(-1) for various conservative assumptions. High heating efficiencies would imply that hot exoplanets such the gas giants WASP-12b and WASP-17b could be completely evaporated within 1 Gyr. We also show that the heating efficiency can be constrained when m. is inferred from observations and the stellar X/EUV luminosity is known. This leads us to suggest that eta approximate to 100% in the atmosphere of the hot Jupiter HD 209458b, while it could be lower for HD 189733b. Simultaneous observations of transits in the ultraviolet and X-rays are necessary to further constrain the exospheric properties of exoplanets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available