4.3 Article

Effectiveness and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist irbesartan in children with chronic kidney diseases

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 1057-1063

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(02)03083-2

Keywords

irbesartan; chronic kidney disease; hypertension; proteinuria; childhood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies in adults with chronic kidney diseases demonstrate that the orally available angiotensin 11 antagonist irbesartan reduces arterial pressure and pathological proteinuria, mostly with an excellent tolerability profile. Little information is available on irbesartan in childhood. Methods: A total of 44 pediatric outpatients with chronic kidney disease (27 male and 17, aged 3.7 to 18 years, median 10 years) were given irbesartan once a day during 18 weeks for arterial hypertension (N = 23), proteinuria (N = 8), or both (N = 13). Results: In patients with hypertension, the use of irbesartan 4.1 (3.1-5.3) mg/kg body weight daily (median and interquartile range) was associated with a decrease (P < .005) in arterial pressure by 17 (13-22)/10 (7-12) mm Hg. In patients with overt proteinuria the urinary protein excretion decreased (P < .01) during treatment with irbesartan (2.9 [2.0-4-81 mg/kg body weight) by 52 (0-75) mg/[m(2) X h]), whereas plasma albumin increased (P < .05) by 4 (1-5) g/L. The frequency of abdominal pain, constipation, cough, diarrhea, dizziness, edema, fatigue, headache, insomnia, myalgia, orthostasis, and rash was similar before and with irbesartan. Plasma sodium slightly decreased, whereas plasma potassium increased, with irbesartan (P < .01). Conclusions: In pediatric patients with chronic kidney diseases, irbesartan given once a day for 18 weeks significantly reduces arterial pressure and proteinuria, with an excellent tolerability and side effect profile. (C) 2002 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available