4.5 Article

Expression profile of T cell associated molecules in the interfacial tissue of aseptically loosened prosthetic joints

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1153-1156

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021137921463

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The involvement of T cells in the progression of inflammation in response to wear debris at the interface of aseptically loosened joints is currently undefined. This cell type has repeatedly been demonstrated to be a common component of the cellular membrane, the interface, which forms between the bone and implant of total joint replacements (TJRs) [1, 2]. Three further insights into the role of this cell type in the interface were investigated here. Immunostaining demonstrated CD4 expression in 80% of the 15 cases tested while CDS expression was present in 60% of the cases. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected IFN-gamma mRNA expression in 75% of eight cases tested; in contrast IL-10 mRNA was only demonstrated in 50% of these same cases. Proteins extracted from another eight cases of revision tissue were analyzed using Western blotting for IL-17, fractalkine (Fkn) and CD40. IL-17 and Fkn were a consistent feature of all cases tested (8/8), while CD40 was undetectable in one case (7/8). These results show that T cells present in the interface are more commonly of the helper T cell phenotype, although cytotoxic T cells are also present. Helper T cells (Th) are responsible for the polarization of the immune response through their production of key mediators. The PCR results obtained in this study suggest that a Th1 response characterized by the production of IFN-gamma predominates over the Th2, IL-10 mediated response. Furthermore the demonstration of the expression of IL-17, Fkn and CD40, all of which are Th1 associated molecules, supports this conclusion. (C) 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available