4.5 Article

An ATR- and Chk1-dependent S checkpoint inhibits replicon initiation following UVC-induced DNA damage

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 24, Pages 8552-8561

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.24.8552-8561.2002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA055065, R01 CA081343, P30 CA016086, P30-CA16086, CA55065, CA81343] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES010126, R01 ES011012, P30-ES10126, T32 ES007017] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibition of replicon initiation is a stereotypic DNA damage response mediated through S checkpoint mechanisms not yet fully understood. Studies were undertaken to elucidate the function of checkpoint proteins in the inhibition of replicon initiation following irradiation with 254 nm UV light (UVC) of diploid human fibroblasts immortalized by the ectopic expression of telomerase. Velocity sedimentation analysis of nascent DNA molecules revealed a 50% inhibition of replicon initiation when normal human fibroblasts were treated with a low dose of UVC (1 J/m(2)). Ataxia telangiectasia (AT), Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS), and AT-like disorder fibroblasts, which lack an S checkpoint response when exposed to ionizing radiation, responded normally when exposed to UVC and inhibited replicon initiation. Pretreatment of normal and AT fibroblasts with caffeine or UCN-01, inhibitors of ATR (AT mutated and Rad3 related) and Chk1, respectively, abolished the S checkpoint response to UVC. Moreover, overexpression of kinase-inactive ATR in U20S cells severely attenuated UVC-induced Chk1 phosphorylation and reversed the UVC-induced inhibition of replicon initiation, as did overexpression of kinase-inactive Chk1. Taken together, these data suggest that the UVC-induced S checkpoint response of inhibition of replicon initiation is mediated by ATR signaling through Chk-1 and is independent of ATM, Nbs1, and Well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available