4.8 Article

Identification and quantification of feathers, down, and hair of avian and mammalian origin using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 74, Issue 23, Pages 5960-5968

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac020347f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a fast method for the identification of the origin of native and chemically processed feathers, down, and hair and for distinguishing closely related species using enzyme digestion and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Additionally we present two methods for the quantification of different identified bird and mammalian samples, respectively, in binary species mixtures. Without any prior cleaning or isolation of single proteins, enzymatical digests of feathers, down, and hair are performed. Fragments generated are analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and peak groups of different selectivity are established for every animal species. For the identification of individual animal species, only unique species-specific peaks are accepted while for species classification of tinted or bleached hair, the group of semispecific peaks (SEMPs) is used. Samples from native animal species show a higher coincidence of digest peak masses of SEMPs than far-related species, indicating a phylogenetical relationship of the investigated structure proteins. Quantification of mixed binary avian samples is performed by identification of preweighed single feathers and down, followed by calculation of the gravimetric mass fractions. The composition of mixed binary mammalian samples is calculated from correlation of the quotient of the relative peak intensities or areas of these species and the quotient of corresponding gravimetric mass fractions. High accuracy is achieved by both quantification methods. The fast methods are well suited for industrial quality control for example.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available