4.3 Article

Physiol-morphological analysis on axile root growth in upland rice

Journal

PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 286-293

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1626/pps.5.286

Keywords

amyloplast; apical unbranched zone; axile root; C-13; gravitropism; growth angle; Oryza saliva L.; photosynthate

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth directions and elongation rates of axile roots that compose the framework of an upland rice root system are quite varied. The objective of this study was to elucidate the direction of growth of the axile roots relative to their root diameter and the structural characteristics of their root caps. The relationships of photosynthate translocation to either the growth direction or the elongation rate of the axile roots were also examined using a stable isotope C-13. The growth direction of the axile roots significantly correlated with their diameter. The axile roots with a relatively large diameter tended to elongate vertically in the vegetative stage, though the regression coefficients varied according to phyllochrons. The roots that emerged at the reproductive stage elongated horizontally relative to the large diameter. In the roots that emerged at the same phyllochrons, the prophyll roots elongated more vertically than the proximal roots did. The axile roots that elongated vertically formed wide columellae and large amyloplasts in the cap cells. The highest C-13 abundance in the axile root tip zone was found at 21 hrs after feeding (CO2)-C-13. The length of the apical unbranched zone behind the axile root tip positively correlated with the C-13 abundance in the root apical zones during the first 21 hrs after feeding, indicating that the roots that elongated fast would be superior in photosynthate intake in the apical zone. The axile roots that elongated vertically took in more photosynthate in their apical zones, however, the relationship was not particularly close.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available