4.6 Article

Angle-dependent radiative grain alignment Confirmation of a magnetic field - radiation anisotropy angle dependence on the efficiency of interstellar grain alignment

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 534, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117670

Keywords

polarization; dust, extinction; ISM: magnetic fields

Funding

  1. CASLEO observatory
  2. CONICET [PIP0348]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Interstellar grain alignment studies are currently experiencing a renaissance due to the development of a new quantitative theory based on radiative alignment torques (RAT). One of the distinguishing predictions of this theory is a dependence of the grain alignment efficiency on the relative angle (Psi) between the magnetic field and the anisotropy direction of the radiation field. In an earlier study we found observational evidence for such an effect from observations of the polarization around the star HD 97300 in the Chamaeleon I cloud. However, due to the large uncertainties in the measured visual extinctions, the result was uncertain. Aims. By acquiring explicit spectral classification of the polarization targets, we have sought to perform a more precise reanalysis of the existing polarimetry data. Methods. We have obtained new spectral types for the stars in our for our polarization sample, which we combine with photometric data from the literature to derive accurate visual extinctions for our sample of background field stars. This allows a high accuracy test of the grain alignment efficiency as a function of Psi. Results. We confirm and improve the measured accuracy of the variability of the grain alignment efficiency with Psi, seen in the earlier study. We note that the grain temperature (heating) also shows a dependence on Psi which we interpret as a natural effect of the projection of the grain surface to the illuminating radiation source. This dependence also allows us to derive an estimate of the fraction of aligned grains in the cloud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available