4.6 Article

A MAD view of Trumpler 14

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 515, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913688

Keywords

instrumentation: adaptive optics; stars: early-type; stars: pre-main sequence; binaries: visual; open clusters and associations: individual: Tr 14

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present adaptive optics (AO) near-infrared observations of the core of the Tr 14 cluster in the Carina region obtained with the ESO multi-conjugate AO demonstrator, MAD. Our campaign yields AO-corrected observations with an image quality of about 0.2 '' across the 2' field of view, which is the widest AO mosaic ever obtained. We detected almost 2000 sources spanning a dynamic range of 10 mag. The pre-main sequence (PMS) locus in the colour-magnitude diagram is well reproduced by Palla & Stahler isochrones with an age of 3 to 5 x 10(5) yr, confirming the very young age of the cluster. We derive a very high (deprojected) central density n(0) similar to 4.5(+/- 0.5) x 10(4) pc(-3) and estimate the total mass of the cluster to be about similar to 4.3(-1.5)(+3.3) x 10(3) M(circle dot), although contamination of the field of view might have a significant impact on the derived mass. We show that the pairing process is largely dominated by chance alignment so that physical pairs are difficult to disentangle from spurious ones based on our single epoch observation. Yet, we identify 150 likely bound pairs, 30% of these with a separation smaller than 0.5 '' (similar to 1300 AU). We further show that at the 2 sigma level massive stars have more companions than lower-mass stars and that those companions are respectively brighter on average, thus more massive. Finally, we find some hints of mass segregation for stars heavier than about 10 M(circle dot). If confirmed, the observed degree of mass segregation could be explained by dynamical evolution, despite the young age of the cluster.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available