4.6 Article

Herschel observations of FIR emission lines in brightest cluster galaxies

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 518, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014569

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F002963/1, ST/G001995/1, ST/G002339/1, ST/G004994/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002963/1, ST/G001995/1, ST/H00243X/1, ST/G002339/1, ST/G004994/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1109061] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The question of how much gas cools in the cores of clusters of galaxies has been the focus of many, multiwavelength studies in the past 30 years. In this letter we present the first detections of the strongest atomic cooling lines, [CII], [OI] and [NII] in two strong cooling flow clusters, A1068 and A2597, using Herschel-PACS. These spectra indicate that the substantial mass of cold molecular gas (> 10(9) M-circle dot) known to be present in these systems is being irradiated by intense UV radiation, most probably from young stars. The line widths of these FIR lines indicate that they share dynamics similar but not identical to other ionised and molecular gas traced by optical, near-infrared and CO lines. The relative brightness of the FIR lines compared to CO and FIR luminosity is consistent with other star-forming galaxies indicating that the properties of the molecular gas clouds in cluster cores and the stars they form are not unusual. These results provide additional evidence for a reservoir of cold gas that is fed by the cooling of gas in the cores of the most compact clusters and provide important diagnostics of the temperature and density of the dense clouds this gas resides in.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available