4.6 Article

SDSS-based taxonomic classification and orbital distribution of main belt asteroids

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 510, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913322

Keywords

minor planets, asteroids: general; methods: miscellaneous

Funding

  1. FAPERJ
  2. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. The present paper aims to derive a new classification scheme for SDSS MOC asteroid colors that is compatible with previous taxonomies based on spectroscopic data. The distribution of these can give important clues to the formation and evolution of this region of the Solar System, as well as to locate candidates with mineralogically interesting spectra for detailed observations. Methods. Themethodology is based on the large database SDSS MOC4. Templates of the main taxonomic classes are derived and then used to classify the asteroid observations in the SDSS MOC4. The derived taxonomic scheme is compatible with the Bus taxonomy and is suitable to the peculiarities of the SDSS observations, in particular, the low spectral resolution. Results. Density maps of the seven classes defined by the method reproduce classical results for the background which is mainly dominated by the S(p) class in the inner belt and by the X(p) and the C(p) classes beyond 2.8 AU. It also shows new structures, such as the fact that the X(p) and C(p) seem evenly distributed in the inner belt while in the outer belt the S(p) class increase in density only at the location of asteroid families. Although their overall distribution is similar, the X(p) class seems less frequently associated with large families than do the C(p) class asteroids. Although only clustering around the Vesta family, the V(p) class asteroidsnappear scattered all around the main belt. Besides the lack satisfactory explanations of most of the highlighted features, they may provide strong constraints on the models of the formation and evolution of the Solar System.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available