4.7 Article

Delayed argatroban treatment reduces edema in a rat model of intracerebral hemorrhage

Journal

STROKE
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 3012-3018

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000037673.17260.1B

Keywords

antithrombins; brain edema; intracerebral hemorrhage; thrombin; rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Studies indicate that thrombin plays an important role in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)-induced edema formation. Although thrombin is produced as the blood clots, it may be bound to fibrin and only gradually released from the clot. The time window for administration of a thrombin inhibitor to reduce ICH-induced edema is unknown. Whether this time window extends beyond the period when a thrombin inhibitor might exacerbate rebleeding is also unknown. Methods-This study examines (1) whether argatroban, an inhibitor of both free and fibrin-bound thrombin, can reduce edema formation after intracerebral infusion of 100 muL of blood in the rat; (2) the therapeutic time window for argatroban; and (3) whether argatroban promotes rebleeding in a model in which ICH was induced by intracerebral injection of collagenase. Results-Intracerebral infusion of blood caused a marked increase in perihematomal water content. Intracerebral injection of argatroban 3 hours after ICH caused a significant reduction in edema measured at 48 hours (80.9+/-1.0% versus 82.6+/-0.8%; P<0.01). The systemic administration of high-dose argatroban (0.9 mg/h) starting 6 hours after ICH also significantly reduced edema (80.3+/-1.1% versus 82.0+/-1.3% in vehicle controls; P<0.05). There was no protection when the onset of argatroban administration was delayed to 24 hours after ICH or if a lower dose of argatroban (0.3 mg/h) was used. Argatroban did not increase collagenase-induced hematoma volume when given into the clot after 3 hours or given systemically at 6 hours. Conclusions-Our data suggest that argatroban may be an effective therapy for ICH-induced edema.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available